Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: RE: panel data


From   Joerg Luedicke <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: RE: panel data
Date   Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:55:14 -0500

-help mi-

J.

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Deepti Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot Sola and Nick for guiding me towards multiple imputation.
>
> However, some of commands like 'mim' are not working in my version of stata. I am using Stata 11. Can somebody please guide me towards the link that explains stata commands for "multiple imputation" in Stata 11.
>
> Thanks!
> Deepti
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 10:46 PM
> Subject: Re: st: RE: panel data
>
> This link will help to understand multiple imputation:
> ttp://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/STATA/faq/mi_longitudinal.htm
> I hope this help.
> Sola
> Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Cox <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:01:03
> To: '[email protected]'<[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: RE: panel data
>
> How would you force Stata to use observations with missing values in any regression? What's a "best case scenario" here? Have you thought about multiple imputation?
>
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> Deepti Garg
>
>
> I have around 170 firms and around 16 variables in a panel data with firms having data for at the most 5 years. However,  I dont have data for all the firms for all the variables. So, when I run regression command, stata only picks the data which has the data for all the variables and my results are inappropriate.
>
> However, when I run the regression with each independent variable separately, I get the desired results. Is it valid to run separate regressions for all the variables and analyse the
> results. Or, is there any way where I can force stata to consider records which do not have all the data and take a best case scenario?
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
> Deepti
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *  http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *  http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *  http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *  http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *  http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *  http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *  http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index