Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Christopher Baum <kit.baum@bc.edu> |

To |
"statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: within estimator and effecomic effects |

Date |
Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:27:40 -0500 |

On Feb 1, 2012, at 2:33 AM, Erasmo wrote: > To assess economic significance, people in finance (including myself) > usually rely on the effect of 1 standard deviation increase in the > independent variable (multiplied by the coefficient estimate). The > standard deviation is usually the sample standard deviation. In > principle, this seems incorrect when one is using the within estimator > (such as the estimator from xtreg). In this case, it would seem more > natural to rely on the within-unit standard deviation. > > But I am wondering whether this is the correct way of looking at things. > > I would appreciate if you could share any thoughts on this. I don't see what the problem is. If you presume the model is y = X b + D g + epsilon, with D the matrix of units' dummy variables, you are proposing to consider a 1 sigma change in X times the appropriate b. Although when you apply the within transformation, the sigma of the within-transformed variable will be smaller than that of the original data, the model is unchanged, and you can still sensibly consider a one-sigma change in the original X times the respective coefficient. If you estimated the model without the within transformation and with dummies, the question would not arise. So it should not arise here either, and you should use the overall sigma of X, not the sigma of within-transformed X. Kit Research Papers in Economics (RePEc) http://repec.org * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Re: st: Program error after installing Stata 12.1 for the MAC.,** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Program error after installing Stata 12.1 for the MAC.** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Re: st: Program error after installing Stata 12.1 for the MAC.,** - Next by thread:
**st: Re: factor analysis and bootstrapping** - Index(es):