Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: RE: Measures of association for a small sample


From   Francisco Rowe <frowe@ucn.cl>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: RE: Measures of association for a small sample
Date   Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:04:57 +1000

David,

They (e.g. the data for regions) were straight extracted from censuses.

FR.

On 11/01/2012, at 10:47 AM, David Hoaglin wrote:

> Francisco,
> 
> Within a region, are the values of the two variables estimates, with
> standard errors (and perhaps also a correlation)?
> 
> In any event, the scatterplot suggested earlier is a good idea.
> 
> David Hoaglin
> 
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Francisco Rowe <frowe@ucn.cl> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Thanks for your all valuable comments (thanks David for the interesting links).
>> 
>> When I talked about population -please correct me if I am wrong- I refer to census data on the labour force for the total number of regions (13) of country which are my aim of study.
>> 
>> Does it still apply as population? or should I say sample, so I need statistical tests?
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index