Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: means compairison with weights and unequal variance


From   Barbro Widerstedt <appoloniak@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: means compairison with weights and unequal variance
Date   Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:36:29 +0100

Mis-classifying a Welsh person as English is never a good idea: I
could see how that could get you down... And prickly? Considering the
time you spend at this, I would say saintly ...

Best wishes
/Barbro (after having set up an appropriate filter and recovered 234
mails from the spam box )

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote:
> I use gmail myself, and don't get classified as spam.
>
> Not a good day for me, after being called twice a "prickly guy from Northern England" by that President guy from central Texas.
> Especially as I'm Welsh.
>
> Nick
> n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk
>
> Barbro Widerstedt
>
> Sorry, I did not see your earlier answer  -- for some reason your
> mails are archived as spam in gmail.
>
> Thank you, I'll consider your answer. And try to de-spam you :)
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote:
>> See also the suggestions made earlier in the thread at
>>
>> http://stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-11/msg01010.html
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Barbro Widerstedt <appoloniak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Now I feel a bit stupid -- of course. It is what I do for other
>>> outcomes, and the strategy should be as valid in this case... I'll
>>> have a look and see if they give me the same conclusion at p<0.05
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Ariel Linden, DrPH
>>> <ariel.linden@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Why not simply use -regress- and the weight generated in -cem- (cem_weights)
>>>> as the aweight with robust se? This is the approach suggested by the
>>>> authors. See:
>>>>
>>>> Stefano M. Iacus, Gary King, and Giuseppe Porro, "Matching for Causal
>>>> Inference Without Balance Checking", copy at
>>>> <http://gking.harvard.edu/files/abs/cem-abs.shtml>
>>>>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index