Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
corn@mail.tu-berlin.de |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: ma(1) model, cannot explain the predicted values |

Date |
Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:20:57 +0100 |

Thanks for your answer, but I don't understand, what g man_prede=_b[_cons] replace man_prede = _b[ARMA:L.ma]*(L.D.wpi-L.man_prede) /// + _b[_cons] in 3/l does?

Mh, I don't get it. I thought the normal ma(1) model is: y(t)= constant + e(t) + coef.*e(t-1) ? Zitat von Tirthankar Chakravarty <tirthankar.chakravarty@gmail.com>:

You haven't taken care of the initial conditions in your predictions. The following example shows you how to construct the predictions manually in the way that Stata does. This uses the fact that the unconditional prediction is the the estimate of the intercept: ********************************** webuse wpi1, clear arima D.wpi, ma(1) predict stata_pred, xb g man_prede=_b[_cons] replace man_prede = _b[ARMA:L.ma]*(L.D.wpi-L.man_prede) /// + _b[_cons] in 3/l li ********************************** T On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:59 AM, <corn@mail.tu-berlin.de> wrote:Hello, I want understand ma(q) processes. Thats why I made up an example for myself. I have one time series variable called SIE with 20 values (from 08.10.2002 up to 04.11.2002) and the a corresponding variable with time data. first, I type tsset time (time is my time variable) then I want a ma(1) model, so I type arima SIE, ma(1) I get an output, which says that my coef. of the constant is 41.72032 and my coef. of my maL1. is 1. Now, I want to have a look at the values, so I type predict values, xb predict residuen, residuals and the list and my proplem now is: I want to control these values by calculating them by myself: The first values of SIE are: 08.10.2002 32.05 09.10.2002 32.42 the predicted values (variable "values") are 08.10.2002 41.72032 09.10.2002 36.88516 and the residuals 08.10.2002 -9.670321 09.10.2002 -4.465162 now I tried to calculate: I thought ma(1) means: y(1) = constant +e(1)+coef.*e(0) = 41.72032 + (-9.670321) + 1*0= 32.05 ok this works, now y(2): y(2) = constant + e(2)+coef.*e(1) so y(2) = 41.72032 + -4.465162 + 1*-9.670321 but this is not 36.88516 ? Please, can you explain, how to get the value 36.88516? I dont see it.... Thanks a lot! * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/-- Tirthankar Chakravarty tchakravarty@ucsd.edu tirthankar.chakravarty@gmail.com * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: ma(1) model, cannot explain the predicted values***From:*Tirthankar Chakravarty <tirthankar.chakravarty@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: ma(1) model, cannot explain the predicted values***From:*corn@mail.tu-berlin.de

**Re: st: ma(1) model, cannot explain the predicted values***From:*Tirthankar Chakravarty <tirthankar.chakravarty@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Conditional infile statements** - Next by Date:
**st: twoway rspike legend too thin** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: ma(1) model, cannot explain the predicted values** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: ma(1) model, cannot explain the predicted values** - Index(es):