Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: xthtaylor by hand or using xtivreg2
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: xthtaylor by hand or using xtivreg2
Date
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:29:32 +0000
Those are all names of temporary variables used within a program and which disappear at program end.
Nick
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of M.M. Kramer
Sent: 10 November 2011 11:22
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: xthtaylor by hand or using xtivreg2
Dear Mark,
The xtoverid works very well, thanks a lot for your help. It now gives
first stage results for all instrumented variables, and given that all
variables are instrumented, I get many first stage results, including
some useful statistics. My only question is whether there is an easy way
to see which variable is behind the "recoded" variable that xtoverid
creates (with names like: __00000J __00000M __00000P __00000S __00000V,
etc). I was thinking to correlate them with the original variables to
see whether something can be inferred from that, but the new variables
are not kept in Stata. Do you have any suggestion for this?
Thanks,
Marc
>
> Schaffer, Mark E wrote:
>> Marc,
>>
>> The xtoverid update is now available (with thanks as usual to Kit Baum).
>> The -noi- option automatically triggers the -first- option in the
>> internal call to -ivreg2- so you should see everything about the
>> first-stage estimations.
>>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/