Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
"'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: bootstrap reject() |

Date |
Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:32:53 +0000 |

Looking at the help for -bootstrap- I see an option -reject()- which appears to do exactly what you ask. I don't think we can comment on correctness. If this makes sense in context, it makes sense in context. What people you report to might say is difficult to second guess, unless this is a matter of following their instructions. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Shehzad Ali A colleague asked this question. Is there a way to specify a range (or rejection region) for the parameter of interest when using the -bootstrap- program in Stata? She is using GLM for her cost data, followed by predicting costs for the treatment and control arms, then taking the difference between mean costs in treatment and control arms. The standard error of the difference in mean costs is then estimated by bootstrapping the process. In order to execute this, she is using the following general approach: capture program drop bootstrap1 glm model followed by predicting costs for treatment=1 and treatment=0. Then the difference between mean predicted costs for the two groups is saved as a scalar 'costdiff'. Subsequently, Stata's -bootstrap- is used to repeat this process a 1,000 times. bootstrap costdiff=r(costdiff), reps(1000) saving(bootrep1, replace) seed(1234): bootstrap1 However, some of the predicted cost differences are very huge (>5% of the bootstrap samples) and the SE is also huge (several times the SE in the observed sample). Is there a way, the predicted costs could be restricted within a range (for instance, the cost difference should be within a range that is close to the observed sample) or would this approach be incorrect? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: RE: RE: bootstrap reject()***From:*Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**References**:**st: bootstrap reject()***From:*Shehzad Ali <drshehzad_ali@yahoo.com>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: RE: assigning same number to slightly different string var.** - Next by Date:
**st: Re: xtmod, lag/lead variables** - Previous by thread:
**st: bootstrap reject()** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: RE: bootstrap reject()** - Index(es):