Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: 3sls-fe regression for panel data


From   Daniela A <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: 3sls-fe regression for panel data
Date   Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:24:05 +0100

Dear Sami,

My mistake - I am sorry:

V1 enters the second equation and V2 enters the first equation - the correct is:

The system consists of two symultaneous equations.

The variables are:

First equation: dependent and endogenous variable is V1;   explanatory
varibales are A, B, C, V2, E;    fixed effect are: firm, year

Second equation: dependent and endogenous variable is V2;    explanatory
varibales are A, B, C, V1, G;    fixed effect are: firm, year



On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Sami Alameen <[email protected]> wrote:
> regarding the panel part there are many ways for
> single equation
>
> xtset firm year
> xtreg v1 a b d c e i.year, fe
>
> and so on
>
> for SUR
>
> sureg (v1 a b c d e f i.firm i.year) (v2 a b c f g i.firm i.year)
>
> Correction: the command for SUR model is _sureg_ not sur
>
> Good luck
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index