Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Nicolai Borgen <nicolai.borgen@sosgeo.uio.no> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: Multiple endogenous variables IV. Estimating the first stage regression with only a subset of the instruments |

Date |
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:08:19 +0200 |

Best, Nicolai On 25.10.2011 15:39, Millimet, Daniel wrote:

No, the system is under-identified. The easiest way to see that your solution would still fail (even if it were acceptable to only include a subset of the exogenous vars in each first-stage) is that the fitted values for x1 and x2 will be linearly dependent since z1 and z2 are linearly dependent. Daniel **************************************************** Daniel L. Millimet Research Fellow, IZA Professor, Department of Economics Box 0496 SMU Dallas, TX 75275-0496 phone: 214.768.3269 fax: 214.768.1821 web: http://faculty.smu.edu/millimet **************************************************** -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Nicolai Borgen Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 8:00 AM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: Multiple endogenous variables IV. Estimating the first stage regression with only a subset of the instruments I have a question regarding the use of instrumental variables when having multiple endogenous variables. I am estimating the economic return of attending different educational institutions X1, X2 and X3. For simplicity, the models are presented without control variables and constant. [A1] Y= δ1*X1 + δ2*X2 + δ3*X3 + ε Since I have strong reasons to suspect that X1, X2 and X3 is correlated with ε, it is necessary to use an instrumental variable approach to estimate the return. I therefore use proximity (in km) between municipality of adolescence and these institutions as instruments (Z1, Z2 and Z3). Using regression commands such as ivregress and ivreg2 in STATA, all instruments are included in the first stage for each endogenous variable X1, X2 and X3: [B1] X1 = B1*Z1 + B2*Z2 + B3*Z3 + ε [C1] X2 = B1*Z1 + B2*Z2 + B3*Z3 + ε [D1] X3 = B1*Z1 + B2*Z2 + B3*Z3 + ε My problem occurs because X1 and X2 are located in the same city, and Z1 and Z2 are therefore perfectly collinear. Thus, in [B1] and [C1] either Z1 or Z2 is dropped. My model is therefore basically under-identified. Based on this, I have the following two questions: (1) Is it possible to estimate the first stage regression using a subset of the instruments? [B2] X1 = B1*Z1 + ε [C2] X2 = B2*Z2 + ε [D2] X3 = B3*Z3 + ε (2) This STATA page http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/ivr_faq.html shows an example of how to perform the two-step computations for the instrumental variable estimator without using ivregress or ivreg2. Is this a feasible solution? Are there any STATA commands I can use that do this? Many thanks, Nicolai Borgen University of Oslo * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

-- Nicolai Borgen Institutt for sosiologi og samfunnsgeografi Universitet i Oslo Postboks 1096 Blindern 0317 Oslo Tlf.: +47 22 85 86 67 e-post: nicolai.borgen@sosgeo.uio.no * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: RE: Multiple endogenous variables IV. Estimating the first stage regression with only a subset of the instruments***From:*"Millimet, Daniel" <millimet@mail.smu.edu>

**References**:**st: Multiple endogenous variables IV. Estimating the first stage regression with only a subset of the instruments***From:*Nicolai Borgen <nicolai.borgen@sosgeo.uio.no>

**st: RE: Multiple endogenous variables IV. Estimating the first stage regression with only a subset of the instruments***From:*"Millimet, Daniel" <millimet@mail.smu.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: reshape** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: RE: RE: RE: Not the same results with GARCH** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: Multiple endogenous variables IV. Estimating the first stage regression with only a subset of the instruments** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: RE: Multiple endogenous variables IV. Estimating the first stage regression with only a subset of the instruments** - Index(es):