Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Estimated regressors and GMM


From   Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Estimated regressors and GMM
Date   Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:21:48 -0500

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Tsatsaronis, Konstantinos
<Konstantinos.Tsatsaronis@bis.org> wrote:
> I am having trouble in estimating by stacked GMM a model with generated regressors. I checked through past postings and FAQs but I was not too successful. I was wondering if anyone could offer a helpful tip.
>
> Here is one of my attempts to set it up:
>
> gmm (eq1: x - {b0} - {xb:Z1 Z2}) (eq2: y - {c0} - {c2}*(x - {b0} - {yb:Z1 Z2}) - {cw:W1 W2 W3}), inst(Z1 Z2)
>
>
> STATA complains variously about the weighting matrix not being positive definite, about the instrument list etc.

You posted the syntax, which is a good step towards solving the
problem. Post your error messages, as well. With two instruments and
two equations, you have only 4 d.f. in your estimation space, but it
seems like you want to estimate 7 or 8 parameters. No wonder Stata is
lost. Can you use W1 W2 W3 as instruments as well?

-- 
Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name
Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index