Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Chris Min <cmsk0109@yahoo.com> |

To |
"statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: How to set a range from 0 to positive infinity in calculating integrals? |

Date |
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:15:12 -0700 (PDT) |

Dear Maarten, Thank you for the clear explanation -- I think it absolutely makes sense. Might I ask you one more quick, related question? If I want to calculate an integral of y=normal(-x) (i.e., a=-1 and b=0 in my previous example, shown below again) over x[0,+inf], I guess I should be able to obtain an approximation using a reasonably high figure for an upper bound, because as x approaches a positive infinity y=normal(-x) approaches 0 (based on your explanation). Am I correct? Thanks in advance for your further help! ****************** set obs 100 range x 0 ? gen y=1-normal(ax-b) /* where a and b are scalars */ integ y x, g(integral) ----- Original Message ----- From: Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Cc: Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:10 AM Subject: Re: st: How to set a range from 0 to positive infinity in calculating integrals? On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Chris Min wrote: > But, I did mean "normal()" in my example (i.e., I need to calculate integrals of cumulative normal), not normalden(). In that case, would your explanation still apply to my example? In case of the cumulative density function my instinct tells me that the answer will be positive infinity. The argument I made before worked because at ever larger numbers the density function gets closer to 0, so it will add increasingly less to the integral, meaning that after some suitably high number you can approximate those contributions to be 0. The cumulative density function approaches 1 at positive infinity, so the contributions to the integral at higher numbers will not be approximately 0, so the area under the cumulative density function for 0 to positive infinity will also be infinite. Hope this helps, Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: How to set a range from 0 to positive infinity in calculating integrals?***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: How to set a range from 0 to positive infinity in calculating integrals?***From:*Chris Min <cmsk0109@yahoo.com>

**Re: st: How to set a range from 0 to positive infinity in calculating integrals?***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**Re: st: How to set a range from 0 to positive infinity in calculating integrals?***From:*Chris Min <cmsk0109@yahoo.com>

**Re: st: How to set a range from 0 to positive infinity in calculating integrals?***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: # of Obs. in -stcox- result** - Next by Date:
**st: sigma_e sigma_u** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: How to set a range from 0 to positive infinity in calculating integrals?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: How to set a range from 0 to positive infinity in calculating integrals?** - Index(es):