Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Steven Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: Relative survival - strel |

Date |
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:39:58 -0400 |

Sam, I suggest that you read a survival analysis text or look at one of the many tutorials to be found on the net, e.g. Stephen Jenkins's "Survival Analysis Using Stata:" http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/survival-analysis Steve On Oct 6, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Tim Evans wrote: Hi Sam, strel is a programme for calculating relative survival, updated and maintained by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (for Nicks information!). I think you have to look at how strel is calculating crude survival by looking in the ado file. I think you could say there are two types of crude survival - one where you simply divide number of events by the number of cases (which takes no account of survival time) - so 'Crude' crude survival, or you can have a sophisticated crude survival which takes account of the survival time or person years in the analysis and gives a weighted crude survival. This is what strel does - if you look at the code in the ado file, you will see this: gen Crude=exp(-sum(deaths/p_years*_width))*100 This is why you don't get an exact division in the manner you suggest. An exact division would be if the survival time of all of the death cases was 2.5 years. I think its upto you to decide which is more useful for you, but the above is common practice and if you used strs (an alternative programme in Stata) it also calculates crude survival like this. As an aside, I don't know what data you are calculating relative survival on, but your break points seem too wide to take into account variations in underlying mortality. By having only one break point of 5 years, you are assuming that there is no change in risk of mortality between 0-5 years. Without knowing your data, I doubt this is a correct assumption. Hope this helps Tim -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Sam Leary Sent: 06 October 2011 11:07 To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: Relative survival - strel Dear all, I am a bit of a novice at survival analysis, but am trying to calculate relative survival using strel. My variables are death_5y = 1 if died by 5 years after diagnosis, 0 if still alive at 5 years age_diag = age at diagnosis (years) age_death = age at death or 5 years, whichever came first (years) I have downloaded a lifetable which has the following variables: country calendar_year sex age rate and I have only kept the data for the calendar year relating to the start date of my audit. I have also sorted this file by age then sex. So I have used the following commands to calculate the crude and relative survival at 5 years after diagnosis: stset age_death, failure(death_5y) origin(age_diag) strel 0 5 using "ltab_s1",mergeby(sex) My question is, as there are 257 deaths out of a total of 468, why is the crude survival percentage 41.86 using strel, rather than (468-257)/468 = 45.1? Many thanks, Sam. ---------------------- Dr Sam Leary Senior Lecturer in Statistics Working hours: Monday, Tuesday and Thursday 7.30am - 2.30pm Lifecourse Epidemiology and Population Oral Health Research Group Department of Oral and Dental Sciences Bristol Dental School Lower Maudlin Street Bristol BS1 2LY Tel 0117 342 3264 Fax 0117 342 4443 E-Mail: S.D.Leary@bristol.ac.uk * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ _DISCLAIMER: This email and any attachments hereto contains proprietary information, some or all of which may be confidential or legally privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s) only. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient(s), please notify the author by replying to this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or rely on this e-mail or any attachments, as this may be unlawful. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: RE: Relative survival - strel***From:*Tim Evans <Tim.Evans@wmciu.nhs.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**st: label values** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: RE: dates** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: RE: Relative survival - strel** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: RE: Relative survival - strel** - Index(es):