Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Carlo Lazzaro" <carlo.lazzaro@tin.it> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: R: How to "reverse" log transformed result |

Date |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:04:03 +0200 |

Dear Morten, I do share the previous comments in that without knowing what you typed is difficult to advise. However, for what it worths, back transforming from a log transformation, the mean on the original scale can be obtained by exp(lm+lv/2), where lm and lv are the mean and the variance on the log scale, respectively. See as a useful reference: Briggs, A. and Nixon, R. and Dixon, S. and Thompson, S. (2005)Parametric modelling of cost data: some simulation evidence. Health Economics 14(4):pp. 421-428. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/4151/. Kindest Regards, Carlo -----Messaggio originale----- Da: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Per conto di Morten Støver Inviato: mercoledì 28 settembre 2011 9.41 A: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Oggetto: st: How to "reverse" log transformated result I'm doing an multilevel linear regression analysis where I try to investigate if there are variation in the lenght of the rehabilitation process before people are being granted a disability pension. I measure this in days, and since my data are very skewed, I've done a log transformation. Now I wonder how I can transform the results back to the original scale of measurement. As an example, this are the results for the different types of diagnosis. "Other" diagnosis: (ref) Mental disorders: 0.1993938 Musulosceletal: 0.0840664 If I now try to transform the data back using di exp(.1993938) I get the result 1.2206626. If I try to analyse the data without log transforming them, I find that the mental disorders group have 166 days (95% CI: 75.5-265.6) longer rehabilitation time before being granted a disability pension than the "other" diagnosis group. I guess that the di exp is not the right way to transform the results back, but I don't know any other way to do it. I'm using Stata 11. Thank you for your help * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: Re: R: How to "reverse" log transformed result***From:*Morten Støver <morten.stover@ntnu.no>

**Re: st: R: How to "reverse" log transformed result***From:*Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: How to "reverse" log transformated result***From:*Morten Støver <morten.stover@ntnu.no>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: weights in pooled repeated cross sections** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: R: How to "reverse" log transformed result** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: RE: How to "reverse" log transformated result** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: R: How to "reverse" log transformed result** - Index(es):