Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Tirthankar Chakravarty <tirthankar.chakravarty@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Fit chi2 as in gammafit |

Date |
Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:46:57 -0700 |

Maarten, That is how I thought about it too, but for the consistency of the parameters, and hence for the fit, results of pseudo-maximum likelihood theory indicate that it doesn't matter which member of the one-parameter linear exponential family is used (so the Poisson, as in my example, will do just as well) for parametric fit (as long as the mean is correctly parameterised), and so it is probably best not to mess too much with the definition and folklore of the chi2-distribution in deference to the conservatives Nick alludes to. T On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Nick Cox wrote: >> Ho hum. A conservative might want the free parameter to be integer-valued. > > That pretty much depends on how you think about the Chi square > distribution. If you think of it as the sum of nu squared independent > standard normal variables than it makes sense to constrain nu to be an > integer. If you think of it as just a skewed distribution with mean nu > (and variance 2*nu) than nu can be any positive number. > > -- Maarten > > -------------------------- > Maarten L. Buis > Institut fuer Soziologie > Universitaet Tuebingen > Wilhelmstrasse 36 > 72074 Tuebingen > Germany > > > http://www.maartenbuis.nl > -------------------------- > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- Tirthankar Chakravarty tchakravarty@ucsd.edu tirthankar.chakravarty@gmail.com * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Fit chi2 as in gammafit***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: Fit chi2 as in gammafit***From:*Laurie Molina <molinalaurie@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Fit chi2 as in gammafit***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Fit chi2 as in gammafit***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Fit chi2 as in gammafit***From:*Tirthankar Chakravarty <tirthankar.chakravarty@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Fit chi2 as in gammafit***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Fit chi2 as in gammafit***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Fit chi2 as in gammafit** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Evaluating the importance of interaction effects in logistic regression** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Fit chi2 as in gammafit** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Fit chi2 as in gammafit** - Index(es):