Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: RE: problem running mfx after glm |

Date |
Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:25:00 -0500 |

At 06:04 PM 8/15/2011, Marlis Gonzalez Fernandez wrote:

I am trying to analyze a new variable (categorical 5 levels) stillaccounting for marginal effects since audcompCombdiv100 is aproportion so I wrote:glm audcompCombdiv100 Age Gender0Male1Female DWIVolumei.Discharge_Location, family(binomial) link(logit) robustmfx, at(mean) -default predict() is unsuitable for marginal-effect calculation -r(119); Is the problem the use of -i.var-?

margins, dydx(*) atmeans

------------------------------------------- Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 HOME: (574)289-5227 EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: problem running mfx after glm***From:*Marlis Gonzalez Fernandez <mgonzal5@jhmi.edu>

**st: RE: problem running mfx after glm***From:*"Sarah Edgington" <sedging@ucla.edu>

**st: RE: RE: problem running mfx after glm***From:*Marlis Gonzalez Fernandez <mgonzal5@jhmi.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: problem running mfx after glm** - Next by Date:
**st: twoway line graph with two groups and confidence intervals** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: RE: problem running mfx after glm** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: problem running mfx after glm** - Index(es):