Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: nl without listwise deletion


From   Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: nl without listwise deletion
Date   Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:19:45 +0100

No; not without imputation. 

Any way, how would that work? What would "considering", be precisely? 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

hossein hosseini

Nonlinear regression estimation (with nl command) disregards all
observations that have missing values.
Is there any possible way to do nl without listwise deletion?( i.e.
Considering missing values too)


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index