Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
John Luke Gallup <jlgallup@pdx.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: question about value labels |

Date |
Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:01:22 -0700 |

Alberto, You can replace the variable name with a variable label in -outreg- (and in -estout-, although I am less familiar with the syntax). -outreg-, which is downloadable from SSC, takes Stata's estimation output and reorganizes the table (if you want), which can be written to a Word or a LaTeX file. You can apply variable labels with the following command: . qreg ... . outreg, varlabel John On Jul 29, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Nick Cox wrote: > I guess you mean variable labels. This kind of problem is usually tackled in one way or another by user-written reporting programs. Users of -outreg- (SSC) or -estout- (SSC) may be able to help. > > Stata's problem with putting variable labels in that place is at least twofold. First, variable labels can easily be too long to fit in the space available. Second, variable labels can contain characters not allowed in tagging coefficients and other results. > > Nick > n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk > > Alberto R Osella > > I'm using Stata 11.2 on W7 32. > This is my problem. When I run quantile (or other estimation command) > regression > I obtain this results: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > | Bootstrap > BMI | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. > Interval] > -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- > q83 | > Etarecl | .4231606 .077804 5.44 0.000 .2705788 > .5757424 > _ISesso_1 | -2.084183 .3866436 -5.39 0.000 -2.842432 > -1.325934 > _INewStatC~2 | -2.012533 1.533809 -1.31 0.190 -5.020495 > .9954286 > _INewStatC~3 | 2.189235 1.099711 1.99 0.047 .0325863 > 4.345883 > _INewStatC~4 | .2256583 .6364043 0.35 0.723 -1.022398 > 1.473714 > Età_q | -.0038322 .0007235 -5.30 0.000 -.0052511 > -.0024133 > _IProfessi~1 | -.9928611 .8899386 -1.12 0.265 -2.738125 > .7524025 > _IProfessi~2 | -.714227 .8651048 -0.83 0.409 -2.410789 > .9823349 > _IProfessi~3 | -.0487982 1.022199 -0.05 0.962 -2.053439 > 1.955843 > > As I want to pass this result to a tex table I'd like to put the > original the original value labels, that is: > Divorced and not _INewStatC~2. > Is there a way to do this automatically? > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: question about value labels***From:*Alberto R Osella <arosella@irccsdebellis.it>

**st: RE: question about value labels***From:*Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**st: how to name random effects panel regression equations to compare coefficients** - Next by Date:
**st: Spatial regression with non-symmetric weights** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: question about value labels** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: Correct Way to Respond to Posts when Email is Turned Off** - Index(es):