Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Getting all independent vars from a set of reg equations


From   Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Getting all independent vars from a set of reg equations
Date   Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:35:58 +0200

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Maarten Buis wrote:
> In the code I sent I deliberately did _not_ say anything like -local x
> = ...- but always -local x ...- or -local x : ...-. The 244 character
> limit for strings does not bite as long as you do not evaluate your
> macros (i.e. as long as you leave the =-sign out) . See among others:

Nick warned me privately that my example did contain an "=" sign. The line

local x = r(X)

should be

local x "`r(X)'"

Sorry,
Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany


http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index