Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: impute with draws from random distribution


From   Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: impute with draws from random distribution
Date   Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:07:30 +0200

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:03 AM, D-Ta  wrote:
> The sample consists of of individuals (with covariates x1 and x2) who can
> either be participating in programm 1, programm 2, or be non-participants.
> The non-participants are my controll group. One of the control variables
> that I would like to condition on in a subsequent matching step is time to
> participation. By definition, time to participation is not observed for the
> non-participants. Hence, I would like to create hypothetical values in that
> variable for the group of non-participant. It is standard in the literature
> to randomly draw from the distribution of the participants.

It is absolutely wrong to try to impute values that for logical
reasons cannot exist. This is a case where the "dummy variable method"
for dealing with missing values is valid. See for example footnote 4
in Paul D. Allison (2002) Missing Data, Quantitative Applications in
the Social Sciences 136. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Hope this helps,
Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany


http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index