Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: hosmer lemshow goodness of fit statistics


From   Steven Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: hosmer lemshow goodness of fit statistics
Date   Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:20:59 -0400

No, just the reverse: small p-values indicate lack of fit.  But Ann is asking for guidance on cut-points, and I know of none.

Steve




On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:34 AM, Yusvita Triwiadhian S. wrote:

Hi Ann

as i know,it depends on your alpha that you are using. if significancy
< alpha, it means the model fits the data well.

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Fitzmaurice, Ann E.
<a.e.fitzmaurice@abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
> Good evening
> 
> I have run a series of logistic regressions and obtained the HL GOF statistic, I have read in articles that "the HL GOF fits the data well" or that "the HL GOF statistic fits the data adequately"
> 
> Does anyone know if there are cut points for the definition of good fit,  or adequate fit and if so what is the reference (s)
> 


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index