Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: Difficult wide file


From   Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: Difficult wide file
Date   Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:03:28 +0100

This is rather too general to evoke a specific answer (from me at any rate). But more positively, I'd assert that long rather than wide is the better way to analyse data of this kind in Stata [sic] in the great majority of problems, so you are better off where you are. So, why not spell out what different types, different coding and "doesn't appear to like" mean? (There is no homunculus inside; it's just zeros and ones.) 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Guy Mole

I am trying to create a wide file from long data. Each patient in the data has had several angiograms which I would like put on the same line. The angiograms are however sometimes coded differently (as they are different types) and some other variables are coded differently for the same patient (which is what STATA doesn't appear to like). Is there a way to get STATA to ignore the differently coded variables, and so just put one full line for each patient ID? Many thanks in advance for your help.


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index