Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Steven Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Probit/Logit - implied probability |

Date |
Mon, 16 May 2011 17:18:51 -0400 |

I assume that you don't have Stata 11 and can't use -margins-. Pre-11, -adjust- will do what you ask, but that doesn't mean its answer will be what you would expect. See http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2010-07/msg01596.html and the following post by Michael Norman Mitchell. Steve sjsamuels@gmail.com Hi everbody, does anyone know how to calculate the "implied probability" after a logit regression, meaning that each independent variable is kept at its mean value? Perhaps there is an after-regression tool like margins? Thanks very much! Ben -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Probit/Logit - implied probability***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**RE: st: Probit/Logit - implied probability***From:*"David Radwin" <dradwin@mprinc.com>

**References**:**st: Probit/Logit - implied probability***From:*"Ben Ammar" <Ben-Ammar@gmx.de>

- Prev by Date:
**st: merging fuzzy-non-exact data** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: Probit/Logit - implied probability** - Previous by thread:
**st: Probit/Logit - implied probability** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: Probit/Logit - implied probability** - Index(es):