Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: too good to be true : lr test in mlogit? |

Date |
Mon, 16 May 2011 09:49:26 +0200 |

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:31 AM, John Litfiba wrote: > 1) The log likelihood doesnt converge when I try to fit a random or > fixed effect with xtlogit on my entire dataset.. > I have to chose a very "small" (well, compared to the total size of > the sample) of about 10000 observations in order to see the results... > otherwise I get an error message after 3 or 4 iterations If you do not tell use what the error message is than we obviously cannot help you. We need to know exactly what you typed and what Stata told you in return. > 2) The idea of running lets say M regressions over randomly chose > samples could be a solution, but it is statistically valid ? I mean if > I obtain the distribution of the parameters across my M simulation can > I infer something on the parameters of the simulation that should have > been done on the entire dataset ? No, but if you sample correctly a single random sample of higher level units will be just as valid a sample from your population as your large sample, just with a smaller N. The added value of additional observations tends to decrease with sample size, so going from 10 to 11 observations will have a much bigger effect on your inference than moving from 100 to 101 observations. There are many estimates for which the difference between 10000 and 10000000 observations is just negligible (but there are estimates where it will matter, for example higher order interaction terms or a categorical variables containing a rarely occurring category). Hope this helps, Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: too good to be true : lr test in mlogit?***From:*John Litfiba <cariboupad@gmx.fr>

**References**:**st: too good to be true : lr test in mlogit?***From:*John Litfiba <cariboupad@gmx.fr>

**Re: st: too good to be true : lr test in mlogit?***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**Re: st: too good to be true : lr test in mlogit?***From:*John Litfiba <cariboupad@gmx.fr>

**Re: st: too good to be true : lr test in mlogit?***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**Re: st: too good to be true : lr test in mlogit?***From:*Joerg Luedicke <joerg.luedicke@gmail.com>

**Re: st: too good to be true : lr test in mlogit?***From:*John Litfiba <cariboupad@gmx.fr>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Simplification of formula in logistic regression** - Next by Date:
**st: WG: Present n in graphs** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: too good to be true : lr test in mlogit?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: too good to be true : lr test in mlogit?** - Index(es):