Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: endogeneity test

From   Austin Nichols <>
Subject   Re: st: endogeneity test
Date   Wed, 11 May 2011 12:14:47 -0400

Dan Bergov <>
Read the -ivreg2- (SSC) help file carefully.

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Dan Bergov <> wrote:
> Hello! I have the following question: I estimated with GMM a liniar equation and then performed AR test, robust to weak instruments. However when I run the condivreg option I have to mention the endogenous variable. So I run an endogeneity test which I noticed that is availabe for iv methods (ivregress syntax with estat endogenous postestimation option). My problem is: if I initially estimated my equation with GMM is it good if I perform also the ivregress gmm estimation which allows me to perform the endogeneity test? (gmm doesn't have this endogeneity test). The problem is that if i estimate with gmm option and on the other hand also estimate with ivregress gmm  I do not obtain the same results (I know that for instance 2sls is a particular case of GMM in the case of homoskedeastic errors) so I do not  know if it is correct to perform the endogeneity test after ivregress but admit that it is the same for GMM estimation.
> I want to estimate with GMM and not ivregress gmm because I do not want to specify the endogenous varibale which is a requirement for ivregress.
> I do not know if I made myself clear. Sorry. Hope for a reply.
> Dan

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index