Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Choice of bw() in ivreg2


From   Christopher Baum <kit.baum@bc.edu>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re: st: Choice of bw() in ivreg2
Date   Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:38:18 -0400

<>
On Apr 26, 2011, at 2:33 AM, Luciano wrote:

> How do I choose the bandwith (bw()) option in ivreg2?
> There's evidence of autocorrelation in the disturbances of 17th order.
> Then is 17 a good candidate?

The bw() should be one more than the lag order that you would use in -newey-, so probably 18 in your example. -ivreg2- from SSC also supports automatic bw selection, so you might try that option and see what it chooses.

Kit
coauthor ivreg2

Kit Baum   |   Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin   |   http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
                              An Introduction to Stata Programming  |   http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
   An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata  |   http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html




*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index