Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: different handling if missings in programs using syntax varlist [if}

From   Nick Cox <>
Subject   Re: st: different handling if missings in programs using syntax varlist [if}
Date   Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:10:57 +0100

I see no puzzle here. In your -foo-, the variable -comment- was
created without reference to -price-. In fact, the rest of the program
had no bearing on that. So, no values were missing.

In -foobar-, things were different. Observation with missing -price-
were excluded.

Sorry, but what's the question here?


On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Bjorn Van Campenhout
<> wrote:
> Dear statalist,
> I have observed different outcomes when I have missing observations in
> programs that use the if qualifier. I was wondering what logic is behind
> this.
> Here is a self-contained example:
> sysuse auto
> replace price=. if foreign==1
> cap pro drop foo
> pro def foo
>  syntax varlist
>  gen comment="this is only a test"
> end
> cap pro drop foobar
> pro def foobar
>  syntax varlist [if]
>  marksample touse
>  gen comment="this is only a test" if `touse'
> end
> foo price
> drop comment
> foobar price
> For those who wonder, I am trying to make a program that reports missings
> and want to be able to use conditions in my function calls.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index