Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: list coefficient estimations


From   "Fernando Rios Avila" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: list coefficient estimations
Date   Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:27:19 -0400

Max,
What u are looking there is only the formatted versions of the coefficients
For instance, if you do:
matrix b=e(b)
svmat double b
and u review the created variables, u will see it is storing those with the
same level of accuracy


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Max Fotbollen
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: st: list coefficient estimations

This is what I get for my coefficients;
 mat li e(b)
e(b)[1,2]
       Storks      _cons
y1  4.4352163   1401.127
Which is by the way the same nember of decimal points that you get in the
output directly after running the model.
Corresponing figure from SPSS storks' coefficient is 4.434216270161429. 
 

 
And here is what I ANOVA figures, which are ok.
 
 ereturn list
scalars:
                  e(N) =  16
               e(df_m) =  1
               e(df_r) =  14
                  e(F) =  226.840002418306
                 e(r2) =  .9418701218260083
               e(rmse) =  415.5066042516718
                e(mss) =  39162959.66552542
                e(rss) =  2417040.334474576
               e(r2_a) =  .9377179876707231
                 e(ll) =  -118.1067415323327
               e(ll_0) =  -140.8673454765096
               e(rank) =  2


----------------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:12:34 +0100
> Subject: Re: st: list coefficient estimations
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> I don't what that means. Perhaps you mean a large number of decimal 
> places. e-class results typically contain far more decimal places than 
> anyone really needs or even wants.
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Max Fotbollen wrote:
>
> > As in SPSS you may get the full decimalpoints for the estimations. That
is what I need, full decimalpoints estimations.
>
> From: [email protected]
>
> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Max Fotbollen wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> > I need to retrive and also save OLS estimates. I use return list,
don't get any resopnses, not even error response. Use rreturn list, then I
get some results in the output, but not the regression coefficients.
> >> >
> >>
> >> What was wrong with the suggestions from Nick Cox?
> >>
> >> http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-04/msg00709.html
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index