Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: svylogitgof: changes dramatically across models using the same pooled sample


From   Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu, statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: svylogitgof: changes dramatically across models using the same pooled sample
Date   Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:35:10 -0500

At 07:53 PM 4/12/2011, Steven Samuels wrote:
Eileen, I assume that you're on Stata 11, since you don't say otherwise. -svylogitgof- doesn't work with subpop() options and has other problems in Stata 11.

See: http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-03/msg00442.html

Steve
sjsamuels@gmail.com

Last I remember seeing, getting -estat gof- to work with the subpop option was on the Stata development list:

http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-03/msg00555.html

I wonder how terrible it would be if you used the -if- option instead of -subpop-? I know that is frowned upon, but if the alternative is to do nothing at all, which is better?


-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME:   (574)289-5227
EMAIL:  Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu
WWW:    http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index