Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Specifying barlook_option on sorted bar graph


From   Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Specifying barlook_option on sorted bar graph
Date   Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:04:48 +0100

What you seek appears in essence to be what is being done -- in
various ways -- in the thread started by Stephen Jenkins yesterday.

Nick

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Mathew Kiang <mathew.kiang@gmail.com> wrote:

> It seems like it should be a simple command, but I've given up in
> frustration and turn here for help.
>
> I'd like to make a series simple bar graphs (let's say two graphs), one
> variable at a time (let's say mpg then cost) over a categorical variable
> (e.g., carmodel), sorted in descending order for each; however, the catch is
> I want a specific car model differentiated in both graphs (via one of the
> barlook_options).
>
> graph bar mpg, over(carmodel, sort(1) descending)
> graph bar cost, over(carmodel, sort(1) descending)
>
> As far as I can tell, when I use a barlook_option like bar(#, color()), I
> have to specify the #th bar, which may not be the same across both graphs. I
> could go back and manually change each, but this quickly gets tedious with
> many different models or many different graphs.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index