Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: replacing time effect from fixed effect panel regression with observed variables


From   Nikunj Kapadia <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: replacing time effect from fixed effect panel regression with observed variables
Date   Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:23:13 -0400

I am running a two-way fixed effect (T, N) panel regression where the panel has data on firms over time as follows:

xi: areg Y X i.date, absorb(firm_identifier) robust cluster(firm_identifier)

Now, I also want to understand whether I can explain the time effect by a set of macroeconomic variables, M.

I was debating between the following three options.

1. Replace i.date by the macroeconomic variables, M.

areg Y X M, absorb(firm_identifier) robust cluster(firm_identifier)

But because my (limited) set of macro variables will not completely account for the time effect, it will bias my standard errors on X. Now, I can use the standard errors from the original specification with i.date for X, so that is not a problem. But in the second specification above, will the standard errors on M itself be biased if there is additional unobserved time effect?

2. Use the T-1 dummy variables estimated from fixed effect panel regression and regress against macro variables as a second step regression.

3. I could average Y over N for each date, and then regress on macro variables.

What would be the pros and cons of the possible approaches? Any comments will be appreciated!

Thanks!

NK


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index