Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: Partially suppressing output
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: Partially suppressing output
Date
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:13:12 +0100
Create those few explicitly beforehand rather than rely on Stata
generating them on the fly. Then you know their names.
Nick
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Dmitriy Krichevskiy
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I have a small question (as an extension of the one below): While I
> have large number of dummy variables that I do not want to see I also
> have a few for which I do want to see the output. To avoid having
> large output I use -quietly- followed by -estimates store- followed by
> -estimates table- with keep( ) option suggested by Nick. However, I
> have an issue where the dummies that I don't want to keep are recoded
> by stata into _varname_# where I do not know what the # is. Is there
> a way to have stata display all _varname_# regardless of how the
> program coded it?
> P.S. I get coefficient _Icorp_# does not occur in any of the models error.
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Look at the -help- for -estimates table-, particularly its -drop()- and -keep()- options.
>>
>> Nick
>> [email protected]
>>
>> Dmitriy Krichevskiy
>>
>> I am running a regression (on Stata 11) which includes a large number
>> of dummy variables. I want to use them as controls but do not care to
>> see the output for those particular variables. Is there a way to
>> suppress a particular variable from reported results?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/