Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Use of matrix values in generate statements


From   Daniel Feenberg <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: Use of matrix values in generate statements
Date   Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:50:10 -0400 (EDT)

I continue to work on a tax calculator for Stata.

I am at the point of calculating the standard deduction for each taxpayer. There are 6 possible filing status's and 24 years of tax law, so there are 144 possible values for the deduction. In SAS, fortran, PL/1, C or any other language I know of, the calculation would be some form of:

   stded = stdvalues(year,filestat)

and the processor would index into the 24x6 array of stdvalues to obtain the value for each taxpayer. As I understand it, Stata matricies can't be used in -generate- statements, though, so I can't do something like:

   matrix input stdvalues (3700 6200...\3800 6350...\...
   generate stded = stdvalues[year-1992,filestat]

(Here and below, ... is meant to conceal a lot of typing on my part but 3700 is the deduction in 1993 for a single taxpayer, 6350 is the deduction in 1994 for a joint return, etc). The most straightforward way I can see to calculate the deduction in Stata would be:

  generate   stded = 3700 if year == 1993 & filestat == 1
  replace    stded = 6200 if year == 1993 & filestat == 2
  ...

and so forth, for 144 lines. I have millions of observations, and will make thousands of runs, so I am looking for a more efficient solution. My next thought is:

  generate stded = (year==1993&filestat==1)*3700+(year==1993&filestat==2)*6200...

which would be one very long line of code once all 144 terms were written out, and still quite a bit of wasted arithmetic. Still a third possibility would be -recode-:

  gen filestatyear = year*10+filestat
  recode filestatyear (19931 = 3700)(19932 = 6200)...

but looking at the -recode- .ado file suggests that this is not an efficiency gain.

I take it I am supposed to -sort- the data by year and filestat, and then -merge- onto a file of parameter values by year and filestat:

  sort year filestat
  merge m:1 year filestat using params

where params is a dataset with the deduction amount for each year and filestat. This is a reasonable amount of code, (even including the code necessary to create params) but it is not space efficient and it strikes me as odd that a large dataset needs to be sorted, just to make some simple recodes. Is that right? Am I missing something?

I note that the -egen- command -mtr- must address this same question, but it is not very fast - about 1,000 observations/minute on our hardware.

Oddly enough, although one cannot index into a Stata matrix, it is possible to index into a series observation:

    generate stded = stdvalues[filestatyear-199200]

is very fast, but doesn't address the problem of filling stdvalues in a not too hackish manner (especially if there are fewer than 144 taxpayers in the dataset).

Daniel Feenberg
NBER

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index