Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Re: Transforming Inflation


From   Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Re: Transforming Inflation
Date   Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:11:11 +0000

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Austin Nichols <[email protected]> wrote:
> No--they shouldn't be symmetrically treated...
>
> I think the poster wanted
> tw function (x)/(100 +x), ra(-20 80)
>
> which one might call twice the coefficient of
> variation, using two observations [on prices], as on
> page 4 of http://www-personal.umich.edu/~nicholsa/an_dds.pdf
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Actually, 100% deflation (prices drop to zero) and 100% inflation
>> (prices double) don't seem quite symmetric.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index