Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: RE: RE: discrepancy in the number of groups


From   Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: RE: RE: discrepancy in the number of groups
Date   Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:01:56 +0000

This is the third posting of this question.

Please note advice in the FAQ about repeating questions at

http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/statalist.html#noanswer

which stipulates the protocol: At most one repeat.

Unless someone else answers, the implication of silence is: Sorry, no
idea, and please take this question elsewhere.

Nick

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:55 AM, EUN BUM CHO <[email protected]> wrote:
> When I ran the two-level random intercept model (firms at level 2 and observations at level 1), firms (i.e., number of groups) were correctly counted as 369.
> But when I ran the three-level random intercept model (industries at level 3, firms at level 2, and observations at level 1), firms (number of level groups) were counted as 370.
> Both share the same sample and I really cannot sort it out why this discrepancy arises.
> Any idea?
>
>
[twice more]
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index