But you do not tell us whether the results for -ivreg- and -ivreg2- were the same.
Eric de Souza
College of Europe
Brugge (Bruges), Belgium
http://www.coleurope.eu
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Jorge Eduardo Pérez Pérez
Sent: 16 February 2011 15:49
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: st: Re: problem with ivregress
Thank you for the suggestion. In fact, the results for -ivreg- and
-ivregress- were not the same. I have contacted technical support for this matter.
_______________________
Jorge Eduardo Pérez Pérez
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Christopher Baum <kit.baum@bc.edu> wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2011, at 2:33 AM, Jorge wrote:
>
>> Can someone provide a hint
>> about why this might be happenning?
>
> Suggest you reestimate with -ivreg- (sic). If the results from ivreg agree with those of B-S-S ivreg2 (as they should) then bring this to the attention of Stata Tech Support, as it could be an ivregress bug (especially as you are getting the same FSRs from ivregress and ivreg2). Stata's own ivreg and ivregress commands should agree with each other.
>
> Kit
>
> Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin |
> http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
> An Introduction to Stata Programming |
> http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
> An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata |
> http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
