Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Joseph Coveney" <jcoveney@bigplanet.com> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: Re: statistical test and sensitivity analysis for matched pairs with censoring |

Date |
Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:27:31 +0900 |

Shoryoku Hino wrote: Thank you for your reply and kind advice. I should have made my question clearer. All I want to know is the test for survival data in case of paired sample. For example, if it were not survival data, we would use signed rank test for continuous variable in pared sample instead of unpaired t-test or rank sum test. I would use McNemar test for proportion instead of chi square test. Rosenbaum's sensitivity test could be applicable in these cases. In my case, survival data, I think there might be a better, more powerful test for paired sample than log-rank test or Wilcoxon test. I would like you to give me any suggestion. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- There is a -strata()- option to -sts test- that would allow you to stratify on pairs. I don't know whether this achieves the same result as does what your reference ("RF.Woolson") is talking about. Have you considered modeling the survival time with -stcox- or -streg- in lieu of paired-sample testing? The model would include some or all of the confounder covariates in addition to the propensity score or an indicator variable for matched pair. See, for example, A. Gelman & J. Hill, _Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models_ (New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007), pp. 206-12; J. Hill, Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: Comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine. _Statistics in Medicine_ 27:2055-61, 2008 ( www.epi.msu.edu/janthony/requests/propensity/Hill_Commentary_2.pdf ); and references cited in them. Another alternative to a simple paired-sample test might be using the scores in a weighted regression model, which would also include some or all of the confounder covariates; see, for example, A. Nichols, Causal inference with observational data. _Stata Journal_ 7:507-41, 2007; A. Nichols, Erratum and discussion of propensity-score reweighting. _Stata Journal_ 8:532-39, 2008. For Rosenbaum-bounds and related analysis, there are user-written Stata commands -rbounds-, -sensatt- and -mhbounds-. The last has an associated article (S. O. Becher & M. Caliendo, Sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects. _Stata Journal_ 7:71-83, 2007) that refers to what had been implemented in Stata up to then. Again, I don't know of anything specifically tailored to censored survival time as the outcome. Joseph Coveney * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Re: statistical test and sensitivity analysis for matched pairs with censoring***From:*Steven Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com>

**st: Re: Re: statistical test and sensitivity analysis for matched pairs with censoring***From:*"Joseph Coveney" <jcoveney@bigplanet.com>

**References**:**st: statistical test and sensitivity analysis for matched pairs with censoring***From:*"Shoryoku Hino" <shoryok@ninus.ocn.ne.jp>

**st: Re: statistical test and sensitivity analysis for matched pairs with censoring***From:*"Joseph Coveney" <jcoveney@bigplanet.com>

**st: RE: statistical test and sensitivity analysis for matched pairs with censoring***From:*"Shoryoku Hino" <shoryok@ninus.ocn.ne.jp>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Automatic line breaks** - Next by Date:
**st: plotting conditional indirect effect with confidence bands** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: statistical test and sensitivity analysis for matched pairs with censoring** - Next by thread:
**st: Re: Re: statistical test and sensitivity analysis for matched pairs with censoring** - Index(es):