Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Jeph Herrin <stata@spandrel.net> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: -predict , reffects- after -xtmelogit- |

Date |
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:20:59 -0500 |

Thanks, the typo was that I had -yrwe- and -ywre- and mixed them up. But this still doesn't tell me how to get the mle random effects, if that is possible. On 12/20/2010 4:47 PM, Tim Wade wrote:

Jeph, I think your example does produce the result you expected, and the calculated random effects agree with results from -predict, reffects-. Maybe there was just a typo. This seems to work: clear use http://www.stata-press.com/data/r11/bangladesh xtmelogit c_use || district: predict re_cons, reffects predict ymu, mu predict yxb, xb gen ywre=logit(ymu) gen re_cons2=ywre-yxb assert round(re_cons2, 0.00001)==round(re_cons, 0.00001) Tim On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Jeph Herrin<stata@spandrel.net> wrote:Bobby, This is very helpful, thanks. I understand shrinkage, but it didn't click when I read the documentation that the distinction was made here. So is there a way to get the mle random effects? I tried predict ymu, mu predict yxb, xb gen yrwe=logit(ymu) gen re_cons=ywre-yfix but this doesn't agree with either sd(_cons) nor with the result of -predict, reffects- thanks, Jeph On 12/20/2010 1:09 PM, Roberto G. Gutierrez, StataCorp wrote:Jeph Herrin<stata@spandrel.net> asks:I am using -xtmelogit- to estimate a random effects model, and am wondering about what is being predicted by -predict, reffects-.Example:clear use http://www.stata-press.com/data/r11/bangladesh xtmelogit c_use || district: predict re_cons, reffectsWhen you use -predict, reffects- after -xtmelogit-, you obtain estimates of the modes of the posterior distribution of the random effects given the data and estimated parameters; see pg. 277 of [XT] xtmelogit postestimation for a complete discussion.Now, I would expect the standard deviation of the random effect reported by the model:-------------------------------------------------------- Random-effects Parameters | Estimate Std. Err. -----------------------------+-------------------------- district: Identity | sd(_cons) | .4995265 .0798953 --------------------------------------------------------To be approximately the standard error of the predicted randome effects, at the district level:bys district : gen tolist = _n==1 sum re_cons if tolistVariable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max -------------+-------------------------------------------------------- re_cons | 60 .0069783 .3787135 -.9584643 .9257698But it seems very different, 0.4995 vs .37871. I must be missing something obvious, but what?The phenomenon you are seeing is known as "shrinkage". Predictions based on the random-effects posterior distribution tend to be closer in magnitude to zero because they are incorporating the prior information that the random effects have mean zero. That is, if you have a relatively small cluster size the prior information that the random effect should be zero tends to dominate. The estimate of sd(_cons) is, in contrast, based on maximum likelihood where all the clusters are considered jointly. Thus, prior information tends to not dominate as much because all clusters are pooling what they have to say about the random-effects standard deviation. Shrinkage dimishes as cluster size gets larger. To see this, try . clear . set seed 1234 . set obs 100 // 100 clusters . gen u = sqrt(2)*invnorm(uniform()) // random effects . gen id = _n . expand 1000 // cluster size is 1000 . gen e = log(1/runiform() - 1) // logistic errors . gen y = (e + u)> 0 // binary response . xtmelogit y || id: . predict r, reffects . bysort id: gen tolist = _n==1 . sum r if tolist The standard deviations match much more closely -- having a cluster size of 1,000 helps! --Bobby rgutierrez@stata.com * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: -predict , reffects- after -xtmelogit-***From:*rgutierrez@stata.com (Roberto G. Gutierrez, StataCorp)

**Re: st: -predict , reffects- after -xtmelogit-***From:*Jeph Herrin <stata@spandrel.net>

**Re: st: -predict , reffects- after -xtmelogit-***From:*Tim Wade <wadetj@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st:-expand- to adjust according to the sampling weight** - Next by Date:
**st: bootstrap xtmelogit** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: -predict , reffects- after -xtmelogit-** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: -predict , reffects- after -xtmelogit-** - Index(es):