Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Difference between xtlogit, xtmelogit, gllamm


From   Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Difference between xtlogit, xtmelogit, gllamm
Date   Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:28:28 +0000 (GMT)

--- On Wed, 15/12/10, Rajaram Subramanian Potty wrote:
> I have event history data and this data has been converted
> into discrete time to fit discrete time hazard model.
> Now, I want to fit a multilevel model. But there are: three
> different proceudres such as xtlogit, xtmelogit and gllamm.
> I want to know which procedure is more appropriate for
> analysing the discrete time data. 

All three will do for a basic multilevel model for the odds 
(not the hazard) of survival. If you want to model a 
multilevel model for the hazard of survival you can use 
-gllamm- with the cll link function. The difference between 
-xtlogit- and -xtmelogit- is that the latter can accomodate 
more complex multilevel structures.

Hope this helps,
Maarten
 
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index