Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: FE Estimate
From
sanjesh kumar <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: FE Estimate
Date
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:25:11 -0800 (PST)
thanks austin for your help. i got the result
----- Original Message ----
> From: Austin Nichols <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Fri, December 10, 2010 2:24:54 AM
> Subject: Re: st: RE: FE Estimate
>
> See also
> -fese-
> etc. on SSC.
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Schaffer, Mark E <[email protected]>
>wrote:
> > Sanjesh,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> >> sanjesh kumar
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 2:33 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: st: FE Estimate
> >>
> >> Hello statalisters
> >>
> >> i have a question regarding estimation with Fixed Effects
> >> (FE) Model. as in the
> >> FE, intercepts are different for different cross-section
> >> units however Stata
> >> prints intercept for the first country only.
> >
> > That's not true - the intercept is a kind of average intercept across
> > all units. Have a look at the manual entry for -xtreg-.
> >
> >> is there a way
> >> or command which i
> >> can use to get the intercept for each cross-sectional unit with FE.
> >
> > Yes - use the -predict- command after estimation. You probably want the
> > -u- option, which gives you the fixed effect u_i. These have mean zero,
> > so if you add the estimated constant you should have your intercepts.
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/