Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Rodrigo Briceño <rjbriceno@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: new explanatory variable in a loop |

Date |
Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:12:27 -0600 |

thanks Nick. No, my dummy has 1s and 0s, based on some previous analysis of residuals. 2010/12/7 Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>: > Yes, you _can_ do that. The central line would become > > quietly regress liq `X' d`i' if isin2==`i' > > However, if each dummy is 1 if and only if the identifier is that named, then the dummy is identically 1 and no purpose is served thereby. Thus if -d3- is 1 if and only if -isin2- is 3, then your variable is just a constant. > > Nick > n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk > > Rodrigo Briceño > > Hello again Stata listers. I am running several regressions (stata > 9.2, windows XP) that contains a set of dummies (each dummy is defined > as a "d" plus the identification number of the bond considered. So for > id3, the dummy is d3, and so on. I made the following loop (this is a > shortened version; the original include tests and exporting > coefficients using estimates store and estout): > > loc X = "sap liqmk m2-m12 mes pprom" > local isin "3 4 247 1 5 6" > foreach i of local isin { > quietly regress liq `X' if isin2==`i' > } > > My question to the list is: can I include something like d`i' as a > new explanatory variable? What I need is that each regression include > its corresponding dummy, so I can do the process automatically instead > of typing individual commands: > > regress liq sap liqmk m2-m12 mes pprom d3 if isin2==3 > regress liq sap liqmk m2-m12 mes pprom d4 if isin2==4 > > > THanks > > -- > Rodrigo Briceño > Economist > rjbriceno@gmail.com > MSN: jbric98@hotmail.com > SKYPE: rbriceno1087 > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- Rodrigo Briceño Economist rjbriceno@gmail.com MSN: jbric98@hotmail.com SKYPE: rbriceno1087 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: RE: new explanatory variable in a loop***From:*Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**References**:**st: new explanatory variable in a loop***From:*Rodrigo Briceño <rjbriceno@gmail.com>

**st: RE: new explanatory variable in a loop***From:*Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: RE: new explanatory variable in a loop** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: RE: new explanatory variable in a loop** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: new explanatory variable in a loop** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: RE: new explanatory variable in a loop** - Index(es):