Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: xtivlogit, fe or ivclogit - Why not?


From   <C.Peterson1@lse.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: xtivlogit, fe or ivclogit - Why not?
Date   Fri, 3 Dec 2010 15:08:40 -0000

Dear StataList,

1) Would anyone care to offer a brief explanation of why an instrumental
variables estimate cannot be made for fixed effects panel data with a
binary outcome? Stata has no xtivlogit, fe or ivclogit options.

2) Do you have any suggestions about how to deal with potential
endogeneity of a continous independent variable in model of panel data
with a binary outcome, in which the Hausmann test indicates fixed
effects estimation?

Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index