Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Re: Making Cohorts
st: Re: Making Cohorts
Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
I want to implement the following strategy on my data.
Consider now the basic linear individual effect model
yit = ai + bXit + uit i = 1,…N; t = 1,…T eq(1)
where Xit is a (K x 1) vector of explanatory variables which we assume
exogenous to the model, index t and
i refer to time and individuals respectively.
Assuming, for simplicity, that there is a unique regressor (K = 1), if we
aggregate all observations to cohort level, the resulting model can be
(y-bar)_ct = (a-bar)_ct + b(x-bar)_ct + (u-bar)_ct c = 1,…C
where (x-bar)_ct is the average value of all observed xit’s in cohort c at
time t, and analogously for the other variables in the model. The resulting
data set is a pseudo panel with repeated observations over T periods and C
now I want to make cohorts (say for) birth year and then want to aggregate
the data as above. But I have 15 countries also and I want to analyse
particular attitudes in countries based on three year surveys(6 waves).
Thanks and Regards,
Maarten buis wrote:
> --- On Thu, 28/10/10, ajjee <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> But I am still confused about COHORT. When I create this by
>> cohort=year-age, now it gives me year of birth of each
>> respondent. Now I want to group each respondent in a unique
>> cohort. I'm quoting procedure from a paper
>> "Define C cohorts, which are groups of individuals sharing
>> some common characteristic like sex or date of birth. These
>> groups are defined in such a manner that each individual is
>> a member of exactly one cohort, and remains a member of this
>> cohort for all periods. For example, a particular cohort may
>> consist of all male individuals born in 1945–1949."
> So, year of birth is one form of cohort: it defines groups that
> are born in a given year. The fact that this confuses you is
> an example of common mistake: Just because something has its
> own name does not mean that it is special or difficult. A
> cohort, as you defined it, is just another name for a variable
> that you want to treat as categorical.
> If you want another categorization, then you need to tell us
> exactly what you want. As the definition you quoted above says
> there are an extremely large number of ways in which you can
> group observations.
> Hope this helps,
> Maarten L. Buis
> Institut fuer Soziologie
> Universitaet Tuebingen
> Wilhelmstrasse 36
> 72074 Tuebingen
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
View this message in context: http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/Making-Cohorts-tp5681938p5682193.html
Sent from the Statalist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
* For searches and help try: