Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: different standard errors with gllamm vs. xtmelogit


From   Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: different standard errors with gllamm vs. xtmelogit
Date   Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:05:48 +0100

It would be odd otherwise. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Stas Kolenikov

In most -gllamm- examples from Sophia, the number
of integration points is even, although I don't know if there any
particular reason for that.


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index