Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: -madfuller- problem


From   spyridoula dimou <speniadimou@yahoo.gr>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: -madfuller- problem
Date   Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:05:36 +0100 (BST)

unfortunately -findit- command does not help! Can anybody explain what can be the problem in my sample?

--- Στις Τετ., 20/10/10, ο/η spyridoula dimou <speniadimou@yahoo.gr> έγραψε:

> Από: spyridoula dimou <speniadimou@yahoo.gr>
> Θέμα: st: -madfuller- problem
> Προς: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> Ημερομηνία: Τετάρτη, 20 Οκτώβριος 2010, 13:13
> Good morning!
> I am trying to check for stationarity in a panle where N=15
> and T=18. Schwertz rule (1989) indicates to use 1 lag but
> the -madfuller- does not seem to work properly in stata9.
> This is my output:
> . madfuller lthe,lags(1)
> Number of gaps in sample:  1
> sample may not contain gaps
> invalid syntax
> lthe is the variable i should check for stationarity. What
> goes wrong?
> Thanks in advance! 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index