Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: reg3 option -robust-

From   John Antonakis <>
Subject   Re: st: reg3 option -robust-
Date   Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:01:48 +0200


You could use the -boostrap- option with reg3. Bootstrapped SEs are not that different from -robust- ones. See:

Ando, M., & Hodoshima, J. (2007). A note on bootstrapped White's test for heteroskedasticity in regression models. Economics Letters, 97(1), 46-51.

If memory serves me right, they talk about the general regression case (and not simultaneous equations), but this should make no difference to the reg3 case.



Prof. John Antonakis, Associate Dean
Faculty of Business and Economics (HEC)
Department of Organizational Behavior
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny

Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305

Home page:

On 18.10.2010 17:50, wrote:
reg3 option -robust-
Do you know if there is a way to estimate a structural equation model in
Stata with the option for robust standard errors?
It seems that the comand reg3 doesnt' support the option -robust-

Thanks a lot for your help,


*   For searches and help try:
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index