Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: R-squared in SUR (Seemingly-Unrelated Regressions)


From   Robert A Yaffee <bob.yaffee@nyu.edu>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: R-squared in SUR (Seemingly-Unrelated Regressions)
Date   Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:41:00 -0400

Khoi,
  The r2 in the sureg are not adjusted, unless you do adjust them
yourself.
  -  Bob


Robert A. Yaffee, Ph.D.
Research Professor
Silver School of Social Work
New York University

Biosketch: http://homepages.nyu.edu/~ray1/Biosketch2009.pdf

CV:  http://homepages.nyu.edu/~ray1/vita.pdf

----- Original Message -----
From: Khoi Dinh To <todinhkhoi@yahoo.com>
Date: Thursday, October 14, 2010 1:35 pm
Subject: st: R-squared in SUR (Seemingly-Unrelated Regressions)
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu


> Dear all
> 
> I ran SUR (seemingly-unrelated regressions) in Stata.  I got 
> R-squared's in the output.  Are these R-squared's already "adjusted"?  
> Or do I need to calculate adjusted R-squared's myself?
> 
> Thank you
> 
> 
>       
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index