Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: xtmixed


From   Schöler, Lisa <lschoeler@wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: xtmixed
Date   Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:26:01 +0000

Hi,

The ratios are smaller than most other numbers.

Thank you
Lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Maarten buis
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 4:23 PM
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: st: xtmixed

--- On Thu, 7/10/10, Schoeler, Lisa wrote:
> I used ratios (e.g. income0=income (in 1000s of $)/sales
> (in 1000s of $)) for the most variables (income, rd ...). Is
> this a problem?

Depends. Do these ratios turn out to be very large or small numbers
compared to the rest of your variables?

-- Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index