Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Neil Shephard <nshephard@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: Finding Stata commands |

Date |
Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:33:44 +0000 |

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Tim <lists@timbp.com> wrote: > out why. So here's a summary. > Monitoring Statalist is great for learning what is available (both in terms > of techniques and in Stata commands). But this is a very active list and I > only read posts where the title relates to something I am working on. I > would search the archives if I were trying a new type of analysis. But I > would not have searched for -psmatch2- and I dispute that "most users" would > have. > > I don't expect Stata or Statalist to give me the best analysis for my > problem. But if I decide I want to do (for example) propensity weighting, I > would hope -findit- would give appropriate results. And I still wonder why > I have never heard of -psmatch2- when (according to Statalist) most Stata > users interested in propensity matching would look for -psmatch2-. > Looks like part of your message was truncated. However, you don't need to know the existence of -psmatch2- as a user-written module for Stata (or any other name that a user has given their command) in advance of searching for it as the following link demonstrates.... Propensity matching --> http://tinyurl.com/36ohbso Propensity weighting --> http://tinyurl.com/2ejmo5r ..the results of which hint at -psmatch- and various other results. Google (and others Microsoft with Bing, Yahoo!) invest a lot of time and money in developing search algorithms for their sites. I would rather see Stata Corp. spend their efforts on developing data management and statistical routines than improving the search algorithm, particularly when the tools that already exist can be used to great effect to find what you are looking for within the relatively small Stata-sphere. As Nick pointed out this does hinge on the authors guessing at the the likely keywords that others would use to search for. In general there would be a common thread to terms people would use when looking for something. Neil (Links are in jest by the way) -- "Our civilization would be pitifully immature without the intellectual revolution led by Darwin" - Motoo Kimura, The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Email - nshephard@gmail.com Website - http://slack.ser.man.ac.uk/ Photos - http://www.flickr.com/photos/slackline/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**re: st: Handbook on impact evaluation with Stata examples***From:*Christopher Baum <kit.baum@bc.edu>

**RE: st: Handbook on impact evaluation with Stata examples***From:*Adam Collins <ACollins@fxb.org>

**st: Finding Stata commands***From:*Tim <lists@timbp.com>

**st: RE: Finding Stata commands***From:*Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: RE: Finding Stata commands***From:*Tim <lists@timbp.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: RE: Finding Stata commands** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: RE: Finding Stata commands** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: RE: Finding Stata commands** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: RE: Finding Stata commands** - Index(es):