Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Bond Tiger <bond0910@ymail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: Estimation binary-continuous outcomes model |

Date |
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:23:06 -0700 (PDT) |

Thanks Martin. It was really helpful. I appreciate your help. I have two more questions, (1) Is there any way I can test for exogeneity of the variables in this (CDSIMEQ) procedure? If not, then what could be an alternative? (2) Does CDSIMEQ procedure gives same results, if the equations are estimated using IV-PROBIT and/or 2SLS? Please help. Thank you. Bond ----- Original Message ---- From: Martin Weiss <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Sent: Thu, September 23, 2010 2:57:40 PM Subject: st: RE: Estimation binary-continuous outcomes model <> "How to calculate the marginal effects from the probit model using this procedure?" The help for -findit cdsimeq- gives an example for marginal effects: *********** clear* sysuse auto, clear cdsimeq (price mpg rep78 weight length) (foreign gear_ratio displacement turn length), est version 7 estimates unhold model_2 mfx, eyex at(median) varlist(displacement turn) *********** Careful, the original says: -sysuse auto, replace-, which is not the usual syntax. Strangely, no error message from Stata, either: sysuse.ado replaces -,replace- with -,clear- internally, although the help file does not make this clear. HTH Martin -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bond Tiger Sent: Donnerstag, 23. September 2010 21:50 To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: Estimation binary-continuous outcomes model Hello, Please anybody tell me about the stata code CDSIMEQ. (1) Is this code, quite prevalent in use in current researches or since it is based on old econometric technique proposed by Maddala (1983), is now not so much in use and rather other advanced methods are in use? If so, what are the methods in use? (2) How to calculate the marginal effects from the probit model using this procedure? Please, please reply. Any help will be highly appreciated. Regards, Bond * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Estimation binary-continuous outcomes model***From:*Bond Tiger <bond0910@ymail.com>

**st: RE: Estimation binary-continuous outcomes model***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: R: Estimating the number of workers in each industry in each district - flag: Stata 9/2 SE** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: RE: Estimation binary-continuous outcomes model** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: Estimation binary-continuous outcomes model** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: Estimation binary-continuous outcomes model** - Index(es):