Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: more on_statsby error


From   rgutierrez@stata.com (Roberto G. Gutierrez, StataCorp)
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: more on_statsby error
Date   Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:22:23 -0500

Al Feiveson <alan.h.feiveson@nasa.gov> writes regarding -statsby:- used with
-xtmixed-:

> Apparently, in an -xtmixed_ command with more than one level, -statsby- can
> only handle options in the fixed or random sections if such options occur
> only once in the whole model:

> [...]

> One option in the fixed part and one option in the first random level:

> . statsby _b[ib],by(condition outcome) : xtmixed y ib, noconst ||isub: ib,noconst  ||fd: R.ib
> invalid 'noconst' 
> r(198);

> In general, -statsby- will fail if there is more than one option section
> anywhere in the model.

Al has discovered a parsing bug in -statsby- when used with -xtmixed-.  We'll
fix this in an ado update.

--Bobby
rgutierrez@stata.com
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index